On this upcoming Lord’s Day (Sunday, May 26), beginning at 6:00 p.m., we will be having our monthly evening service, in addition to our usual morning service schedule.  Please plan to join us for this additional opportunity for fellowship and worship, and plan to invite a friend!

Next Wednesday, May 29, beginning at 7:00 p.m., Lake OPC will be pleased to welcome Dr. Jim and Mrs Jenny Knox, who serve as OPC Missionary Associates to Mbale, Uganda.  The Knox’s will be giving a missionary presentation on their medical missionary work, which will be held in the Medium Meeting Room of the Mayfield Library, located at 500 SOM Center Rd. In Mayfield Village, 44143.  Mark your calendar and plan to attend.  All are welcome!

“And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.” (Acts 2:42, ESV)

“So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord.” (Ephesians 2:19-21, ESV)

We hear a lot today about “community.”  In fact, the word “community” has become quite the buzz word in current conversation.  For example, we read and hear of a vast multitude of contemporary “communities” that have popped up in recent history, such as the “online community”; the “academic community”; the “gay community”; the “trans community”; the “homeschool community”; the “gamer community”; the “vegan community”; the “activist community”; etc.  It would seem that almost every activity, group, interest or cause seeks legitimacy in the eyes of the public by tacking on the word “community.”

But what is a “community”?  However one might understand that term, it is a term that bespeaks such things as social cohesiveness, sharing in a common cause or activity, and the building and nurturing of meaningful relationships around that common cause, interest, or activity.

But why, all of a sudden, has the term “community” become such a common buzz word?

I would suggest that, ironically, the multiplication of “communities” in our contemporary world and the prevalence of the term “community” in today’s lingo, is evidence of both a deep longing for genuine community and a deep sense of isolation and loneliness in our supposedly super-connected world.

To put it another way:  Many today are constantly “connected” through social media and online “communities,” yet few experience the joy and the messiness of genuine community – genuine face-to-face, flesh-and-blood community, with all of its richness and all of its awkwardness.  One can spend hours a day on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, texting, “chatting,” etc., while at the same time doing so from the isolation of one’s basement and with a deep sense of loneliness.  Ironically, social media, for all of its genuine and indisputable benefits, enables us to be all together, yet alone.

It used to be that most people got their sense of community from three vital institutions:  the family, the nation, and religion.  But in our post-modern world all three institutions are on life-support.  In the United States, it used to be that most people got their sense of identity and community from their family (nuclear and extended), their sense of national patriotism (love of and loyalty to country), and their affiliation with their local church or synagogue.  But with the breakdown of the traditional family (thanks in large part to the toxicity of the sexual revolution), the rise of secularism (and thus the decline of religious institutions such as churches), and the cultural denigration of love for country, many today – especially in younger generations! – don’t know who they are, where they came from, why they’re here, or where they can find genuine community.

In our superficial online world where multitudes crave for genuine community, but few experience it, the gospel of Jesus Christ offers a stable identity and a lasting community.  The true and living God is Himself, in a sense, a communal Being, existing eternally as a community of co-equal, co-essential Divine Persons, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, all within the one Divine Being.  God is not an isolated, eternal hermit (as would be the case if He were a unitarian being), but exists eternally as a Trinity of love, fellowship and (dare I say it?) “community.”  The mystery of the Trinity reveals that God is a relational Being, and He has created us (His image-bearers) to be relational, communal beings.  Our sin and rebellion have separated us from fellowship and communion with our Creator (and thus from genuine community).  But through Jesus Christ and His saving work for His people, communion with God and community with God’s people are restored for those who trust in Him with a penitent faith!

If you are a follower of Jesus Christ, having trusted Him alone as your Lord and Savior, then your ultimate identity is “in Christ.”  If you have been baptized into the Triune Name (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), you have been marked with the sign and seal of God’s covenant of grace, and thus you belong to the visible covenant community of Christ, the visible church.  As the church gathers together in corporate assembly around the word and sacraments, engaging together in biblically-based, historically-rooted worship (also known as “liturgy”), it experiences (through faith) living, vital communion with the Lord Jesus Christ, and thus it also experiences the only kind of genuine community that can satisfy our deepest, God-given longings.

The early Christians in the Book of Acts experienced genuine community as they gathered together frequently for instruction, worship, and holy communion, and also as they shared their meals and their lives together (Acts 2:42; 26).  Through grace God had made them part of His forever family, the church, and it is clear that they loved to spend time together with their spiritual brothers and sisters in the Body of Christ.  What a picture of genuine community!  And what a tragedy that such community is so hard to find today.

Lasting, stable community this side of glory can only be experienced as you commune with Christ your Savior in the means of grace, and as you involve yourself in the communion of Christ’s church.  Knowing your identity as a baptized Christian who belongs to your faithful Savior Jesus Christ and to His church – the forever family of God – will not only give you an unshakeable sense of meaning, purpose and destiny.  It can also offer you the sense of genuine community for which you crave.  Christian:  Find your identity, and your community, in the Lord Jesus Christ and in His Body, the church!

I believe it was C.S. Lewis who coined the phrase “chronological snobbery.”  As I understand it, this is the attitude that the present generation has reached the pinnacle of wisdom and enlightenment, and thus has nothing to learn from the benighted voices of the past.  It is essentially an adolescent outlook on life, one which we find in the stereotypical teenager who thinks her parents are totally clueless about almost everything, and thus that life would be so much better in both the home and in society if her parents and other ignorant adults would just embrace her point of view and govern life by her dictates.

As the preacher in Ecclesiastes tells us, there is nothing new under the sun, and this would certainly include chronological snobbery.  Every new generation has had the tendency to view itself as having attained to the pinnacle of wisdom and enlightenment, and thus has tended to smirk at the ideas and traditions of the past with a condescending arrogance.  We focus on the sins and failings of past generations, but ignore the wisdom of the past and the blessings their hard work and sacrifices have brought to us.  (Do we really think that future generations will not look back on us with a critical eye toward the sins and failings of our present generation?)

This arrogance of the present reaches its summit when institutions grounded in God’s creation order and received traditions that have stood the test of time are foolishly discarded by social engineers attempting to redefine reality in the name of “progress.”

For example, the 1981 edition of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: New College Edition defines “marriage” as historically-understood in the following words:  “The state of being husband and wife; wedlock”, and “The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife” (p. 801).  This definition of the institution of marriage is not only grounded in God’s created order as revealed in Holy Scripture (Gen. 2:21-24; Matt. 19:4-6).  It is also grounded in millennia of universal human practice and tradition.

While there is no such thing as a perfect marriage, and while sinful humanity has distorted God’s good gift of marriage, just as it has distorted every other good gift of the Creator; at the same time the marriage institution, as defined above, has stood the test of time and has proven itself to be a vital, foundational institution of any stable social order, and a great source of human flourishing and blessing.  But today’s adolescent-minded social engineers, manifesting the chronological snobbery of the present arrogance, have thought themselves wiser, smarter, and more enlightened than millennia of past generations, and thus have discarded this traditional, biblical definition of marriage by expanding its definition to include “gay marriage” between members of the same sex.

Another example of the arrogance of the present is the attempt by those who pride themselves on being “progressive” to redefine the basic gender categories of male and female – categories which are grounded in God’s creation order and settled scientific reality (i.e., basic biology, genetics, anatomy & physiology) – and to push an anti-realist ideology which absurdly claims that gender is “fluid” or a “spectrum,” and thus that one can “identify” one day as male and the next as female based purely on subjective factors.  The social engineers pushing this ideology have the weight of Scripture, science, human history and everyday human experience marshaled against them.  Nevertheless, they are undeterred in pushing their agenda (and requiring that you and I conform to it!), for they regard themselves as the smart ones, the enlightened ones, the elites, the wise ones who know far better than the foolish generations of the past or the knuckle-dragging neanderthals of the present who continue to cling to such outdated notions of gender.

It has been said that the one thing we learn from history is that we don’t learn from history.  Yet, Holy Scripture is full of history – redemptive, real, space-time historical events – and God expects us to learn the lessons of biblical history, which is, after all, “His Story.”  It is wisdom to study such history with reverence for the sovereign God of history.  It is the height of folly to ignore such history and imagine that we know better than the peoples of the past.

None of this is to claim that we cannot be critical of past generations or point out their sins and failures.  For example, I firmly believe it is right and moral to criticize the evils of the race-based, man-stealing institution of black slavery in America’s past.  Slavery was a grievous national sin and a deep stain upon the noble history of the U.S.A.  (It was also an evil institution that many white men in the Union army during the Civil War shed their blood and laid down their lives to abolish.)  But it is to claim that, just as human beings after the fall are complicated mixtures of the remnants of original virtue combined with the radical corruption, depravity and vice of sin, so human history is a complicated, nuanced business.  We can learn from both its positive and its negative examples.  And in all of this the biblical Christian will measure everything by the ultimate standard of God’s infallible Word.

The bottom line is this:  “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.” (Proverbs 1:7, ESV).  “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble…Humble yourselves before the Lord, and he will exalt you.” (James 4:6, 10, ESV)

Before discarding the deeply-rooted traditions, ideas and institutions inherited from past generations in the name of “progress” (or simply because it has become trendy to do so), ask yourself:  (1) Is it based in Scripture?  (2) Has it stood the test of time, and if so, why?  (3) Why have so many past generations observed or practiced them?  And, (4) If it is right to reject them, what do we propose to put in their place, and what long-term effects will they have?

Let us avoid the arrogance of the present.  Instead, let us critically and thoughtfully embrace the wisdom of the past, even as we press forward to the future.  And in all things, let us strive to be faithful to God’s revealed Word.  “Thus says the LORD:  “Stand by the roads, and look, and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is; and walk in it, and find rest for your souls.”” (Jeremiah 6:16, ESV)

The Bible reveals God to be a God of truth.  Jesus Christ, the Son of God, said of Himself, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.  No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6, ESV; emphasis added).  Therefore, Scripture requires that followers of Jesus be a people who are committed to the sanctity of truth.  As God requires of us in the ninth commandment, “You shall not bear false witness…” (Exodus 20:16, ESV); in other words, don’t lie, either in court or (by implication) in any other arena of life.

Today a dangerous, anti-Christian, anti-reality ideology has taken root in almost every aspect of our society, including many of its’ most influential institutions of academia, the government, the entertainment industry, and even many businesses.  It is an ideology that flies under the noble-sounding banner of “diversity” and “tolerance,” yet intolerantly requires a total, unquestioning, totalitarian conformity to its dictates, acceptance of its propaganda, and which threatens severe consequences to non-conformists, who are branded in broad-brush fashion as “haters.”  Most dangerous of all, it requires that you lie about reality, or else!

To what am I referring?  Answer:  Today’s trendy gender ideology, as promoted by LGBTQA+ activists.

Today’s gender ideology denies that gender is “binary” or necessarily rooted in the biological and genetically-grounded categories of sex (namely, male and female).  It claims that such “cisgender” categories are “assigned” at birth (rather than viewed as givens), but denies that such categories are fixed and immutable.

In gender ideology, if a biological male “identifies” as a “girl”, such an individual is to be regarded as a girl, addressed with female pronouns (“she,” “her”), allowed to use the women’s restroom, allowed to participate in female sporting events, etc.  To refer to such a “transgender” individual using male pronouns is to be guilty of “misgendering” such an individual.  And, for such a sin against today’s gender ideological orthodoxy, its’ more radical adherents want “heretics” (i.e., nonconformists who do not buy into their ideology) to suffer severe consequences for their nonconformity, such as being marginalized and demonized as “haters,” losing their jobs, possibly even facing fines and imprisonment, and other unpleasant consequences.

For example, it is my understanding that a recent gender-pronoun law proposed in Canada threatens fines and/or imprisonment to individuals guilty of “misgendering” others – i.e., not referring to them by their chosen gender pronouns.  The controversial Canadian psychologist and professor Dr. Jordan Peterson has faced a great deal of nasty vitriol, criticism and ridicule for opposing this law on grounds of civil liberties and freedom of speech.

Why should Christians be concerned about this trend?  Why not just “go along to get along”?  First of all, because this ideology is grounded in a deeply anti-Christian doctrine:  The doctrine of self-sovereignty.  In other words, it is based on the lie that “we create our own reality.”

Today’s gender ideology says that your gender is what you say it is, based on which gender you identify with.  Such a doctrine is pure, unadulterated humanism, and involves a deeply narcissistic worship of self.  Faithful, biblically-consistent Christians cannot bow to today’s gender ideology because it is idolatry, and loyal followers of Jesus will not worship idols (including today’s idolatry of the self and of self-identity).

In contrast to today’s gender orthodoxy, the Holy Scriptures, the historic church, and all consistent biblical Christians past and present believe, confess and teach that God sovereignly determines and defines reality – including the reality of gender.  And what does God have to say about gender?  How many genders does the Bible (God’s Word) say there are?  “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” (Genesis 1:27, ESV; emphasis added).

God in His Word defines gender reality in gender-binary terms.  You are either male or female, a boy or a girl, a man or a woman.  Period.  God’s Word does not give any credence to the idea that gender is “fluid,” or that gender is a “spectrum.”  Scripture grounds gender in objective, biological reality – the reality of “male” and “female.”  To go along with the speech codes that today’s gender ideological orthodoxy seeks to impose is to engage in blatant rebellion against God’s created order (and thus to live in rebellion against the Creator Himself), to commit idolatry (by bowing to the idol of self-identity), and – perhaps most significant for today’s culture of speech codes – to bear false witness (i.e., to participate in a lie).  Since Christians are called in Scripture to be a people of truth who are committed to the sanctity of truth, the faithful, biblically-consistent Christian cannot and will not embrace or bow to the lies of today’s gender ideology.

But not only is gender ideology contrary to Scripture and historic Christian doctrine.  Not only is there  a religious problem with today’s gender orthodoxy.  It is also anti-science.  Science and objective everyday reality itself identify human beings under the categories of male and female.  All of us know in our heart-of-hearts that this is true (and thus that gender ideology and transgenderism are false); and on a practical, everyday basis all of us live our lives and relate to others through the objective lens of gender binary reality.  Biology, genetics, human anatomy & physiology (in other words, science) identify you as either male or female, boy or girl, man or woman.  Science and objective everyday reality show an inseparable link between gender and biological sex.  To claim otherwise is to claim raiment for the emperor when in fact the emperor has no clothes.

Now, in stating the above I would be remiss if I did not make some important clarifications, lest the reader misunderstand.

First of all, let the reader understand that I am not denying that there are some men who exhibit feminine qualities, just as there are some women who exhibit masculine qualities.  And that’s fine.  Though God created each of us either male and female, He also created us all with unique personalities and qualities, so we might express our maleness or femaleness in somewhat different ways.  But that does not thereby mean that gender is somehow “fluid” or relative or arbitrary.  (I’m also not denying that there are extremely rare instances where persons are born without a clearly identifiable biological gender, though such is an exceptional condition and deformity, and an exception cannot prove a rule.)

Furthermore, I also recognize that the way we are taught to express either our masculinity or our femininity can vary from culture to culture.  For example, in many western societies historically men typically wore slacks and women typically wore dresses.  But such societal norms are (at least to some extent) culturally relative, and not of themselves definitional of “maleness” or “femaleness.”

In addition, I am not suggesting that Christians should speak or act harshly toward individuals who suffer from gender dysphoria or gender confusion.  Gender confusion is a profoundly painful, deeply real struggle for some, and as followers of Christ we should seek to be sympathetic, compassionate and understanding toward such persons.  Let us remember that individuals who suffer from gender confusion are human beings created in the image of God, and thus should be treated with kindness, tolerance and compassion.  At the same time, it is neither a loving nor a kind thing to reinforce the delusions of those who suffer from gender confusion by (for example) referring to them by their chosen gender pronouns.  (My personal recommendation when interacting with such individuals is to avoid pronouns and to refer to them by name.)

For example, if I were under the sincere delusion that I was in fact Jesus Christ, and thus insisted that everyone address me as “my lord and savior,” would it be a loving thing to concede to my wishes and address me in that manner?  Absolutely not!  In fact, to do so would be one of the most unloving and unkind things you could do for me in such circumstances, for you would only be reinforcing my delusions and thus hurting me further.

Dear Christian reader:  Today we are facing increasing pressure from our culture to conform to the new gender orthodoxy, especially its’ speech codes.  This includes pressure to break the ninth commandment through participating in lying by referring to “transgender” individuals according to their chosen pronouns – even though such pronouns do not reflect objective biological and genetic reality.  We will be told that we are “unloving” – even “bigoted” – if we don’t conform to these speech codes.  But truth speech is not hate speech, and it is in fact unloving to speak lies to our neighbor, especially if such lies only serve to reinforce a harmful delusion.  God in His Word calls us to “speak the truth in love.”  Let us love our neighbor as ourselves by defending the sanctity of truth and refusing to speak lies – even politically correct ones.

There is a myth than many Christians today have bought into, especially here in the United States:  the myth of the so-called “victorious Christian life”.

Allow me to explain, first by clarifying what I do not mean, and then by defining what I do mean by this “myth.”

First of all, it is true that God’s Word does speak of our Christian identity as one of victory.  For example, after speaking of the believer’s security in Christ, of life in the Holy Spirit, and of God’s everlasting love of His own in Christ, the Apostle Paul writes, “No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.” (Romans 8:27, ESV)  Furthermore, many passages of Scripture could be brought forward as showing that in union with Christ the believer has been given victory over sin, death and hell, and is headed for ultimate vindication and victory on the final Day.  I certainly affirm all of these wonderful Bible truths, and am certainly eager to confess and declare Christ’s victory over sin, Satan, death and hell.  By grace alone, and through faith alone, we certainly do share in Christ’s victory, at least in principle, and I would in no way desire to deny it!  But these biblical truths are not what I am referring to when I speak of “the myth of the victorious Christian life.”

What, then, is this “myth”?  In popular American Christianity the notion of the “victorious Christian life” is the idea that, once you have truly made a “decision” for Christ or something equivalent to it (such as “rededicating” your life to the Lord, the “second blessing” of being “baptized in the Holy Spirit”, speaking in tongues, etc.), you can expect to be automatically raised to a higher level of Christian experience where you either no longer have to struggle against sin (or at least you are raised to a level where the struggle becomes much easier), and where your Christian life is an experience of going from one spiritual “victory” to another.  Unlike the “ordinary” Christian living the “ordinary” Christian life of constant struggle against the world, the flesh, and the devil, the “victorious Christian” is raised to a higher plane of spiritual existence where he or she is, essentially, “above” such struggle.

Contrary to this popular myth, the Word of God reveals in many places that, in this present life, the typical Christian life will be one of constant, daily struggle against the world, the flesh and the devil.  In fact, the Christian life is pictured as a battle, and disciples of Jesus are depicted as soldiers who must put on the whole armor of God in their spiritual warfare (see, for example, Ephesians 6:10-20).  The battle of discipleship requires strenuous effort, full engagement, and diligent use of God’s means of grace (especially the word, sacraments, and prayer, in the context of Christian fellowship).  In fact, the Christian life is a life of daily, ongoing renewed repentance, faith and walking after a new obedience.  In theological terms, our sanctification involves daily “mortification” (putting sin to death), and daily “vivification” (renewed daily trust in and obedience to Christ).  Our baptism summons us to this daily renewed repentance and faith, in light of our union with Jesus Christ in His death and resurrection (see Romans 6).

The reason I call the notion of the victorious Christian life a “myth” is because Scripture teaches that in this present life we will never be completely free from or “above” this daily struggle against sin and for holiness.

Yes, it is true that we are already, in principle, victors in Christ, because we are united to Him by faith and through the Holy Spirit, and the Spirit’s presence in our lives is a surety, guarantee and downpayment that one day this struggle will be over, when Christ returns in glory on that final Day of resurrection when our redemption is consummated (Ephesians 1:13-14; Romans 8:23).

However, in this present life we often “groan” as we await that final day (Romans 8:23).  In this present life we often find ourselves conflicted as our good intentions and earnest desires after holiness, produced by the indwelling Holy Spirit, are frequently disappointed by the remnants of the sin nature within us that often makes its’ unwelcome presence felt, leading us to cry out with the Apostle Paul, “Wretched man that I am!  Who will deliver me from this body of death?” (Romans 7:24, ESV).

Furthermore, even though we believers are redeemed and beloved children of God, in this present age we are still often subject to the common afflictions, infirmities and miseries of this life, such as sickness, financial struggle, loneliness, disease, poverty, oppression, etc.  In addition to these common human afflictions, followers of Christ often have the additional burden of having to bear scoffing, ridicule, mistreatment and sometimes even outright persecution due to their allegiance to the gospel.

The modern-day peddlers of the “victorious Christian life” do a great disservice both to potential converts and to God’s people, because they peddle a false and misleading message.  To tell prospective converts that coming to faith in Christ will guarantee them health, wealth, happiness and ease is setting them up for disappointment (at best), or for apostasy (at worst), for it is false advertising.  Jesus never promised His disciples a comfortable life of ease, and there is probably no better formula for producing false converts than a type of “victorious Christian life” teaching that promises (either explicitly or by implication) that the Christian life is a life of ease and comfort.  Furthermore, there are few messages more disheartening and discouraging to the struggling believer than this myth of the “victorious Christian life,” for it basically tells them that their struggles must be due to some defect in their faith.  After all, if they were truly Spirit-filled and walking by faith, then (as the myth would suggest) they would not be having such struggles.

For those believers who have become accustomed to a steady diet of false teaching on the victorious Christian life, the perspective expressed in this blog post might seem shocking, perhaps even depressing.  But, in reality, I would suggest that it should be greatly encouraging to the believer, because it strips away false expectations and assures the struggling believer that the experience of battling intensely against the world, the flesh and the devil are part of the ordinary life of Christian discipleship.  In fact, there is a very real sense in which the Christian life is a life of struggle against the world, the flesh and the devil!

Finally, a rejection of the myth of the victorious Christian life in favor of this more biblical view of the Christian life should encourage the believer because it does assure victory in the end, even as it promises Christ’s intimate presence and abiding grace even in the midst of the struggles we encounter as we live out our lives as followers of Jesus in this present age.  Jesus doesn’t promise us a life of ease and comfort this side of glory, but He does promise to be with us in the midst of our struggles, and He promises to pull us through all of our trials and tribulations in the end!  As our Lord Jesus said, “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you.  Not as the world gives do I give to you.  Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid.” (John 14:27, ESV)  And, “I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace.  In the world you will have tribulation.  But take heart; I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33, ESV)  Dear reader, may this truth comfort and fortify your soul as you do battle against the world, the flesh and the devil!  Amen.

The final point of doctrine in the so-called “doctrines of grace” or “five points of Calvinism” is the biblical doctrine known as “the perseverance of the saints.”  The Westminster Confession of Faith offers a succinct definition of this doctrine in chapter 17, section 1:

“They, whom God hath accepted in his Beloved, effectually called, and sanctified by his Spirit, can neither totally nor finally fall away from the state of grace, but shall certainly persevere therein to the end, and be eternally saved.”

This doctrine is not to be confused with the common distortion of it, which in non-Reformed evangelical circles is called “eternal security” or “once saved, always saved.”

The popular “eternal security” doctrine often conveys the idea that you can be guaranteed eternal salvation, just so long as you make a one-time “decision for Christ” (which often involves revivalistic practices such as praying a ritual “sinner’s prayer” or responding to a so-called “altar call” at an evangelistic meeting).  In this popular view, as long as you have “asked Jesus into your heart” or made that “decision” for Christ, you are guaranteed eternal life in heaven, even if you live the rest of your life in open rebellion against God and His law, and, in some versions of this doctrine, even if you commit apostasy and lose your faith altogether.  This view is one expression of antinomianism, and it is heresy.

Contrary to this shallow, heretical understanding of “eternal security”, the biblically Reformed doctrine of the perseverance of the saints teaches that true believers, though they may fall into sin (even into serious and scandalous sin for a time), will  never totally nor finally fall away from their faith in Christ, but will continue to strive to persevere in faith, repentance and holiness, even to the end of their lives.  The ultimate reason why they will do so is not found in their own merit or will-power or strength or resolve, but in the sovereign and gracious God who plans, accomplishes and applies Christ’s saving grace to His elect.  The God who has chosen, redeemed, called, justified and adopted His elect ones will continue to sanctify them unto the end, enabling them to continue clinging to Christ in daily renewed faith and repentance.  The faith by which God’s elect are saved is not merely a one-time “decision” for Christ, but an ongoing, continuous, Spirit-wrought clinging to Christ as the only Source and Hope of one’s eternal salvation.

The biblically Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints is rooted and grounded in the clear teachings of God’s Word, the Bible, and in the biblical logic of the doctrines of grace.

There are many Scripture passages which teach and support the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints.  To offer just a sampling:

“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life.  He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life.” (Jesus Christ, in John 5:24, ESV)

“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.  I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.  My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.  I and the Father are one.” (Jesus Christ, in John 10:27-30, ESV)

“And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.” (Philippians 1:6, ESV)

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ!  According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.” (First Peter 1:3-5, ESV)

“For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.” (Romans 5:10, ESV)

“There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” (Romans 8:1, ESV)

And, of course, the Apostle Paul’s great “chain of salvation” in Romans 8:30 makes it clear that all who are predestined, called and justified will likewise be glorified in the end.  Which implies that none of those who are thus predestined, savingly called and justified will fall short of the final stage of salvation, glorification.

The biblical logic of the doctrines of grace likewise undergird this important and comforting doctrine of Perseverance.  Think about it:  Scripture reveals that fallen men and women are completely in bondage to their sin natures, totally unable and unwilling to turn themselves to God apart from His sovereign grace (Total Depravity).  God’s choice of sinners for salvation is not based upon God foreseeing that they will meet certain conditions by their own “free will”, but rather it is based upon His sovereign good will and pleasure alone, and made certain by His sovereign decree (Unconditional Election).  In the fulness of time God sent His Son to die on the cross in order to atone for sin and infallibly secure the eternal redemption of those whom the Father had unconditionally elected in Him (Limited Atonement / Definite Redemption).  In time the Holy Spirit applies the redemption purchased by Christ to those who have been chosen (Christ’s “sheep”) and redeemed by Christ by giving them new spiritual life (the new birth) and effectively drawing them, through the gospel, to trust in Christ alone for their salvation (Irresistible Grace).  Perseverance of the Saints is simply the completion of God’s saving plan in the lives of the redeemed.  The idea that one who has been chosen by God, redeemed by Christ, and renewed and called by the Holy Spirit could subsequently fall away, fully and finally, thereby losing his eternal salvation, denigrates the perfection and completion of God’s saving work in Christ.  It would imply that puny man could overthrow the sovereign grace of God.  But the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints comports fully with the biblical logic of God’s saving plan, and therefore it gives glory to the God who, by His grace alone, saves sinners.

But what are we to make of objections to this doctrine?  Two major objections to the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints are that it caters to loose, sinful living, and also that it contradicts passages of Scripture which seem to teach, at least on the surface, the possibility that a true believer can fall away and thus lose the gift of salvation.

Regarding the first objection, it is said that this doctrine implies that believers can be casual about their sin.  After all, if God has unconditionally chosen me, if Christ has infallibly redeemed me, and if the Spirit will preserve me infallibly unto eternal salvation, then why not relax and give oneself over to sin?  This objection confuses the Reformed doctrine of Perseverance with the antinomian doctrine of “eternal security.”

The Reformed view is the perseverance of the saints,  not the preservation of the sinner.  In line with the Word of God, the Reformed doctrine of the true believer’s Perseverance unto the end teaches that, because the true believer has been born again by the Holy Spirit, he hates his sin and seeks to fight against it.

Yes, true believers may and will sin, and sometimes true believers can backslide into serious and scandalous sin.  However, the heart of a true believer is a heart that mourns over remaining sin (Matthew 5:4) and which hungers and thirsts after righteousness (Matthew 5:6).  True, born again believers will not be casual about their remaining sin, but will fight it daily as they long for the glorious day when the last remnants of their sin nature will be finally eradicated and they will be finally conformed fully into the image of Christ in true holiness and righteousness.

Yes, God preserves His elect unto the end, but Scripture indicates that God preserves His people by moving them to persevere in faith, repentance and holiness.  This is why, for example, the Scriptures urge professing believers to examine themselves to make sure they are in the faith (Second Corinthians 13:5), and to give diligence to make their calling and election sure by adding virtue to their professed faith (Second Peter 1:3-11, especially verse 10).  The things that God uses to preserve us in faith include the diligent use of the means of grace (the word and the sacraments, along with prayer) – which is why the Reformed Faith not only stresses the importance of personal Bible reading and prayer, but also diligent and faithful attendance upon the public means of grace in a faithful local church.

What about those Scripture passages that seem to contradict the Reformed doctrine of Perseverance?  Let me close this article with a look at two of the more prominent passages that are often used to deny the Reformed doctrine of the Perseverance of the Faith.

Hebrews 6:4-6 says this:  “For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.” (ESV)

On the surface this passage seems to clearly teach that it is possible for a true believer to fully and irrecoverably fall away from the faith and thus to lose the gift of salvation.  How do the Reformed respond to this passage?

The Epistle to the Hebrews was apparently written to a group of Jewish Christians who faced severe persecution for their faith, and who were therefore mightily tempted to turn away from Christ and revert back to their previous Judaism.  It is a “word of exhortation” to these professing believers, showing the superiority of Christ’s priesthood and the new covenant to the old covenant and its’ levitical priesthood, and urging them to continue to persevere in their confession of the Christian Faith.

This stern warning can be understood in one of two ways:  (1) Some Reformed scholars believe that the language of this passage (which speaks of “tasting” the heavenly gift and the goodness of the gospel) is not speaking of true conversion, but of a powerful yet merely external experience of the Spirit in the fellowship of the visible church.  For example, some have suggested that the “enlightenment” spoken of in this passage merely indicates that they had been baptized, and the “tasting” language merely indicates they have heard the gospel preached and participated in the Lord’s Supper.  In this view the warning implies that mere external participation in the benefits of the visible church, while important, is not of itself sufficient to guard one from falling away from a profession of faith.  True, persevering faith must also be present.  (2) Other Reformed scholars believe that this language is speaking of true conversion, and of the danger of falling away, but is presenting this as a hypothetical, not an actual, possibility.  They point to verse 9, which seems to indicate that such falling away does not belong to salvation.  In this view the purpose of this somber warning is to drive the professing believer to cling all the more closely to Christ and His gospel.  Whichever view one takes, this passage of itself does not contradict other clear passages of Scripture which teach the Perseverance of the Saints.

Galatians 5:4 says this:  “You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace.” (ESV)

This passage uses some very strong language, speaking of being “severed” from Christ and of being “fallen away from grace.”  How do the Reformed understand this language, and how is it compatible with the Reformed doctrine of Perseverance?

In the context of Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians he is seeking to counteract some Jewish Christian false teachers (whom scholars call “Judaizers”) who were teaching the Gentile believers that faith in Christ alone is insufficient for justification before God.  In addition to faith they must also be circumcised and keep the law of Moses.  Paul anathematizes this view as a false gospel, and those who teach it as accursed (Galatians 1:6-8).  His point is that if the Galatians give in to the teaching of the Judaizers and embrace their false gospel of justification by faith plus works, they will in effect be cutting themselves off from Christ and the grace that is offered in the true gospel of justification by faith alone.  To embrace a false gospel of legalism is to fall from the way of salvation by grace alone.  Again, the purpose of this warning is to urge them to continue to cling to Christ alone, and not to fall into legalism.  A Reformed take on this passage would be to say that if any of the Galatians had, in fact, submitted themselves to the false gospel of the Judaizers and persisted in seeking to be justified by works of the law, they would have thereby shown their original profession of faith to be false.  They would have shown themselves to be cut off from Christ and from the grace of the gospel, and thus not true believers.  But none of this contradicts what Scripture so clearly teaches elsewhere about the true believer’s perseverance in the faith.

Praise God that our salvation is secure from first to last!  May these doctrines of grace comfort your soul and add fuel to your Christian life as you continue to cling to Christ in daily renewed faith and repentance, and as you continue to diligently use God’s means of grace.

The doctrines of grace, also known as “the Five Points of Calvinism,” are a seamless garment.  They logically – and biblically – go together and mutually support and imply one another.  So, for example, the fact that mankind after Adam’s fall into sin is spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1-3; Genesis 6:5; Romans 3:9-18), with wills in bondage to sin, and with a sin nature that impacts the whole of man’s being (i.e., total depravity), implies that fallen man is spiritually and ethically incapable of taking the first step toward God and of “choosing Christ” apart from God’s Divine initiative of grace.  Therefore, if God’s people are going to be saved they must be unconditionally elected – chosen of God by pure grace, apart from them meeting any “conditions” which merit God’s choice – from before the foundation of the world and without any foresight of their faith or works (Ephesians 1:4; Romans 9:16, 18).  If the salvation of God’s elect is to be secured, then Christ must die specifically for the purpose of actually redeeming them from sin and thus effectively guaranteeing their eternal salvation (limited atonement / particular redemption; John 6:37; 10:11; 17:6, 8; Ephesians 5:25).  And if they are to be brought to the enjoyment of the salvation that Christ purchased for them, they must be spiritually resurrected and brought to saving faith in Christ (irresistible grace) and kept by the power of God in that grace until the end (perseverance of the saints).

In this brief article I want to focus specifically on the fourth of the five points of Calvinism – namely, irresistible grace.

The doctrine of God’s irresistible grace is a biblical truth made necessary by two biblical considerations:  (1) The biblical teaching on man’s total depravity, which demonstrates that fallen, unregenerate man has a will in bondage to sin, and is thus morally and spiritually incapable of choosing Christ or accepting the offer of the gospel.  The natural, unregenerate man has no interest in the gospel or in the Christ presented to him in the gospel.  While he could, if he wanted to, choose Christ, yet he has no inner desire, no will, to receive and rest upon Christ as He is offered in the gospel.  Thus the natural, unregenerate man who is left to his own choice will inevitably choose to reject the gospel.  It takes a supernatural miracle, a spiritual resurrection, a new birth, to bring a sinner to saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, for fallen man’s heart must be changed before he will desire and choose to come to Christ for salvation.  (2) The efficacious power of God’s Word.  God’s Word is powerful, and accomplishes all that which He intends for it to accomplish (Isaiah 55:10-11).  If God’s Word of grace failed to save anyone for whom that grace was intended, then man’s fallen will is more powerful than God’s grace, God is not God, and believers have no security in their salvation.  The efficacy of God’s Word requires irresistible grace.

Now, of course, fallen man resists God’s grace all the time, in the sense that fallen man resists the claims of gospel proclamation of Christ’s Lordship and the external call of the gospel that comes through the written Scriptures and through the preaching of the gospel.  Gospel preaching and gospel witness can be, and often are, resisted by those whose hearts are devoid of the Holy Spirit.  The Spirit can be resisted in this external sense of resisting and rebelling against the ordinary means of grace, for the Spirit is the Source of those external means of grace.  (It was in this sense that the martyr Stephen was speaking when he accused the unbelieving Jews of resisting the Holy Spirit in Acts 7:51, for they had resisted the preaching of the prophets, the witness of Jesus Himself during His earthly ministry, and the apostolic witness to Christ’s resurrection.)

But when God is intent upon effectively calling an elect sinner out of the bondage and misery of his sin into His kingdom of grace and salvation, the external call of the gospel to repentance and faith will be accompanied by a supernatural, internal work of grace that so changes the sinner’s heart and frees the sinner’s will so that Christ is made sweet to him, and so that he comes most freely and willingly to Christ for salvation as Christ is freely offered in the gospel.  As the Lord Jesus said in John 6:37, “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.” (ESV; emphasis added)  This irresistible grace is God’s effectual, saving call, and is to be distinguished from the mere external call of the gospel (though the saving call comes to God’s elect through the external call of the gospel).  The external call can, and often is, resisted by sinners.  But the saving, effectual call is not and cannot be resisted, for in this saving call God supernaturally changes the heart of a sinner and gives him a will and desire to trust in Christ alone for salvation.  This is why Paul in Romans 8:30 says that all those who are (effectually, irresistibly) called are justified and glorified — a statement which would not be true if he were talking merely about the external call of the gospel.

This precious doctrine of grace has many practical implications for the church.  For example, if God’s grace toward His elect proves in the end to be irresistible, this can give the church confidence in her gospel witness and proclamation to a lost and dying world, for it assures the church that the resistance toward the gospel of even the most hardened sinner can be overcome in time by God’s irresistible grace.  It is also a doctrine which, when correctly understood and heartily embraced, fosters a spirit of humility among God’s people, for it reminds us that our salvation is ultimately not due to anything we have willed or done, but it is solely of God’s grace and God’s grace alone.  We have nothing to boast in, except in the Lord and in His grace!  May this doctrine of grace be precious to your soul, dear reader.

It seems that an increasing phenomenon of pop American Christianity in our postmodern times is a significant rise in the number of what might be called “unchurched Christians” – that is to say, individuals who profess to be followers of Jesus Christ yet who see no need to be involved in responsible membership in a local Bible-believing church.  Below are answers to some common objections one might hear from such unchurched Christians for excusing themselves from either regular church attendance in general, or responsible church membership in particular, or both.

(1) “I’m a very spiritual person, but I just don’t see the need for organized religion.”

The problem with this objection is that biblical Christianity is an inherently organized faith.  Jesus Himself willed it to be so, and in God’s Word the Lord Jesus calls His professed followers to be involved in accountable, responsible membership in a visible, organized expression of His Body, the church.  To willfully despise the church and to reject responsible church membership in a local congregation is to reject the Lordship of Jesus Christ and thus to place oneself outside of the Christian Faith.

Jesus appointed twelve apostles as the foundation upon which the church would be built, Christ Jesus Himself being the Cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20).  A careful reading of the Book of Acts shows the apostles, such as Saint Paul, taking the gospel into new areas, baptizing new converts and their families, organizing these newly baptized converts into local congregations, and training and ordaining local elders to shepherd and oversee these local congregations.  The apostles didn’t just lead people to make a personal decision for Christ and then leave them to their own private spirituality.  The Scriptures reveal that Christ has given the pastoral office to His church to shepherd God’s flock (Ephesians 4:11-12).  Most of the Epistles in the New Testament were written to local, organized churches with a definite membership and leadership, and the Pastoral Epistles (First and Second Timothy, Titus) include instructions on “how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth” (First Timothy 3:15, ESV), including instructions on qualifications for church officers (bishops/overseers and deacons; see First Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:5-9).  Church members are exhorted to obey and submit to their leaders in the church (Hebrews 13:17) – a command that would be meaningless if there was no formal, organized church with a definite membership and clearly-identified leaders.

All of this testifies to the fact that Christianity from the days of the apostles onward has always been an organized religion!  This makes sense, since Scripture reveals God to be a God of order, not a God of confusion and disorder.

Regarding the idea that being “spiritual” allows one to be a “Christian” without being committed in responsible membership to a faithful, organized local church, the fact is that all people are “spiritual” because God has created all human beings with a spirit/soul!  God created us as body-souls, and in that sense we are all “spiritual”.  But being “spiritual” in this sense does not of itself justify one’s claim to be a Christian, nor excuse one from the responsibility to be involved in a local church.

(2) “Christianity is a relationship with Jesus, not a religion.”

This popular statement involves a false dichotomy, an illegitimate “either/or” option.  Yes, of course Christianity involves a “personal relationship with Jesus Christ”.  But it is not only or merely a “personal” matter between the individual soul and the Savior.  Such a narcissistic statement reflects more the extreme hyper-individualism of the American mindset than it does the teachings of the Bible.  It is also a dishonest statement, because of course Christianity is a religion, in the sense that it has Divinely revealed Scriptures, religious doctrines, a code of ethics, and worship practices (including liturgical and sacramental rites).  Of course, it is not a “religion” if by “religion” one means a man-made religion or a system of works-righteousness by which one can “earn” salvation.  Salvation is by God’s grace alone through faith in Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-9)!  However, biblical Christianity is the one, true, God-revealed religion.

Biblical, historic Christianity is inherently corporate and covenantal, not merely private and personal.  When Christ saves a sinner, by the Spirit He not only unites that sinner to Himself; He also baptizes that sinner into the Body of Christ, the church (see First Corinthians 12).

(3) “Going to church no more makes you a Christian than living in a garage makes you a car.”

This seemingly-clever statement is true on the surface, but irrelevant to the question of church attendance and church membership.  No one who knows anything about biblical, historic Christianity will claim that just attending church, or even just being a church member, will in and of itself make you a Christian.  But faithful, consistent Christians will attend and belong in responsible membership to a faithful local church, because that’s what Christians who love Jesus and want to obey His Word do!

Church attendance and church membership do not make one a Christian, but they do help to manifest to the world our profession of faith in Christ, and they also help to nurture and strengthen us in our discipleship.

(4) “Church is boring.”

It is not the church’s job to entertain us.  A Sunday worship service is not a form of religious entertainment.  Rather, it is the church’s job to feed our souls with God’s word and sacraments, and to give us an opportunity to gather together with fellow believers in order to offer God praise and prayer out of gratitude for His gift of salvation in Christ.

I’m all in favor of a well-ordered worship service which engages congregants in active participation and which seeks to encourage their deep interest.  But if you happen to attend a faithful church where the gospel is clearly preached and the sacraments are rightly administered according to God’s Word, but you still find the service to be “boring” or “irrelevant”, then the problem is not with the church.  In such a case the problem rests squarely with you.  If you find the good news of God’s full and free forgiveness of sins through the death and resurrection of Christ to be “boring”, then you need to repent of your blasphemous boredom with God’s good news and ask God to create within your soul a heart-felt interest in the things of the Lord.

(5) “I don’t need the organized church.”

Again, this is an extremely narcissistic, self-focused statement.  You may not feel that you need the church, but the church needs you!

If you are truly a Christian, then Christ has made you part of His Body.  You are a member of the Body of Christ (First Corinthians 12; Romans 12:3-8).  By cutting yourself off from the local church you are depriving the local body of Christ of your spiritual gifts and the encouragement of your presence.  You are acting selfishly.  You are not loving your neighbor as yourself.  A human body which is missing body parts might be able to function and survive, but it survives in a disabled, maimed, weakened condition.  The same is true of the Body of Christ.  When a member is missing or cut off, the whole body suffers.

But there is a sense in which we do need the local, organized church!  If we willfully cut ourselves off from responsible membership in a local, organized expression of the Body of Christ, then there is a sense in which we cut ourselves off from the Head of that Body, namely, Christ Himself!  The Bible indicates that Christ has entrusted the means of grace (word, sacraments, and, in a secondary sense, prayer) to the visible organized church.  To cut oneself off from the church is to cut oneself off from the ordinary means of grace – those means by which God creates and nurtures saving faith within the souls of His elect.  Professing Christians who, over time, cut themselves off from the church often end up altogether abandoning the Christian faith sooner or later.  As our Westminster Confession of Faith rightly states, outside of the visible church there is no ordinary possibility of salvation (Chapter 25.2).  Dear reader, you need the ministry of a faithful, local organized church in order to stay vitally connected to Christ, the Head, and in order to avoid the spiritual danger of apostasy!  So, yes, you do need the organized church.

(6) “I can worship God on the golf course.”

True.  We can engage in private, personal worship within our spirit anywhere, and at any time.  But we cannot obey God’s command not to forsake the assembling of ourselves with other believers in worship (Hebrews 10:25) by skipping church to engage in other activities (like hitting the golf course).

I am sure that there are many other objections that “churchless Christians” offer for rejecting church membership, but the ones above seem to be some of the more common ones.  I hope this article has been challenging and encouraging to you, dear reader.  May we all seek to be committed to Christ and to His church!

“Easy Believism.”  It is a big problem in American Christianity today.  What is “easy believism”?  It is a very prevalent but false understanding of saving faith which is rooted in the decisional theology of certain forms of American revivalism.

Easy-believism misinterprets the biblical doctrine of justification by faith alone by reducing saving faith to a one-time decision of the will to “accept Jesus as personal Savior.”  Accepting Jesus as Lord is viewed as advisable but not necessary for salvation.  (To demand from sinners repentance from sin and the acceptance of Jesus as Lord in order to be saved is viewed as “works righteousness” by proponents of easy-believism.)  From the standpoint of easy-believism, if you’ve made that one-time “decision for Christ” (usually by praying a “sinner’s prayer” or going forward for the “altar call” in response to an evangelistic appeal), then you are eternally secure and bound for heaven, even if you live the rest of your life in wilfull, unrepentant sin.

Of course, from a biblical standpoint there are many things wrong with easy believism.  For example, easy believism is rooted in a very superficial view of human sin and of the human will.  Easy believism at root assumes an unbiblically low view of seriousness of human sin, and thus a much too high view of the power of the human will.  In the theology of easy believism, man has enough inherent goodness left in him to at least make a one-time decision for Christ without the assistance of the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit.  But the Bible teaches that man apart from Christ is dead in his trespasses and sins (Ephesians 2:1), and that those who are “in the flesh” (i.e., unconverted, devoid of the Holy Spirit) cannot please God (see Romans 8:5-8).  If the unconverted man (the man who is “in the flesh”) could make a genuine, saving “decision for Christ” by his own power, without the regenerating grace of the Holy Spirit, then obviously such a saving decision would be pleasing to God.

But probably one of easy believism’s biggest errors is its misinterpretration of “faith”.  Easy believism equates saving faith with a one-time “decision” of the will to “accept Jesus as Savior”, while Scripture teaches that the faith by which we sinners receive salvation is an abiding in Christ (see, for example, John 15:1-7).  Saving faith is not a one-time “decision for Christ”; instead, it is an abiding, ongoing, confident trust in and reliance upon Christ alone for salvation from sin as He is offered in the gospel, a confident trust produced by the Spirit of God through the word of the gospel (John 1:12-13; Romans 10:17).  Saving faith doesn’t just “decide” for Christ once and then have done with Him.  No, saving faith clings to Christ daily, continually, as the only hope for salvation.

Any Bible-believing Christian who is familiar with the world of American Christianity knows that “easy believism” is a very common problem in this country.  How many there are in America today who rarely (if ever) darken the door of a church, who never read their Bibles and hardly ever pray (except when they want something from God, whom they conceive of as a “cosmic bellhop” who exists to make them happy and give them stuff), and who basically live lives of narcissistic self-indulgence, but who nontheless imagine that they are “saved” because they prayed some magic “sinner’s prayer” or walked an aisle once at a revival service in response to an “altar call.”  I say this is a problem because, from a biblical standpoint, such “Christians” have been sadly, dangerously deceived by a false, soul-damning gospel – the “gospel” of easy believism.  When taken to its logical extreme, easy-believism is quite simply a false gospel under the anathema of God (Galatians 1:8-9).

So, what is to be done about the problem of easy believism?  What is the solution to this problem?

Sadly, some Christian leaders (even some who would identify as Reformed) seem to think that the best way to combat “easy believism” is by what I would call “hard believism”.  In other words, they think that the way to win over those who have been deceived by the heresy of easy believism is to re-double their emphasis on the Law of God and on Christ’s call to discipleship, and to step up their calls for professing Christians to examine themselves as to whether or not they “really” believe.

Now, certainly God’s Law is good, righteous and holy (Romans 7:12), and it must be preached by the faithful pastor.  God’s Law not only provides us believers with an objective guide to our sanctification in showing us a life that is pleasing to God, but more important to the issue at hand it exposes our sin and our need for Christ.  And certainly the call to faith is closely connected to the call to follow Jesus as a learner (the meaning of “disciple”) of the kingdom way.  Likewise, there are certainly times and occasions when it is wise for professing Christians to examine themselves before the Lord (for example, Second Corinthians 13:5; First Corinthians 11:28).  But while these may help to address certain aspects of the heresy of easy believism, I do not believe they are the solution to the problem of easy believism.

What, then, is the “solution” to easy believism?  Not “hard believism.”  Not more emphasis on God’s Law.  Not more calls to “radical discipleship.”  Not by incessantly calling upon congregants to question the genuineness of their faith through soul-searching self-examination.  Instead, ironically, the solution to the heresy of easy believism is to proclaim the gospel of justification by faith alone in all of its fulness and freeness!

The Law of God is good, but it condemns us as sinners and law-breakers.  Christ’s call to discipleship is vital, but it (like the Law) reveals to us just how far short we fall when it comes to living up to Christ’s lofty call to “radical discipleship.”  And an over-emphasis on self-examination inevitably ends up ministering to doubt rather than to faith, thereby leading sensitive or overly-scrupulous believers down the pathway toward despair.  But the gospel of God’s free gift of forgiveness in Christ by faith alone inspires within us a love for the Savior who died for us and a deep desire to cast off sin and to live in grateful obedience to the One who loved us so!

After explaining the universal sinfulness of mankind and God’s solution to human sin through the justification of sinners in Christ, the Apostle Paul in his Epistle to the Romans addresses this question in response to the gospel he preached:  “What shall we say then?  Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?” (Romans 6:1, ESV)  Apparently there were some in the early church who either misinterpreted Paul’s teaching on salvation by grace as a license to sin, or else Paul’s enemies slanderously misconstrued Paul’s teaching on grace as involving such a license to sin.  This was basically an ancient type of “easy believism”.

How does Paul respond to this ancient version of “easy believism” – this idea that God’s grace gives believers a license to sin?

Does Paul turn to emphasizing the demands of God’s holy Law?

No.

Does he launch into an exposition of Christ’s call to discipleship?

No.

Does he urge the duty of self-examination before the Lord?

Again, no.

What, then, does Paul do?  He takes his readers back to the implications of the gospel!

In answer to the question of verse 1, Paul responds as follows:

“By no means!  How can we who died to sin still live in it?  Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?  We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.” (Romans 6:2-4, ESV)

Paul takes his readers back to their union with Christ in His saving death and resurrection, a union signified and sealed to them in their baptism.  In other words, he reminds them of the gospel of their salvation through the death and resurrection of Christ, and he draws out for them the practical implications of their saving union with Christ.  Because they are “in Christ” (as signified and sealed to them in holy baptism), how can they imagine that the grace of God gives them a license to sin?  In Christ they have, in principle, “died to sin”.  The gospel of God’s free forgiveness in Christ does not give them a license to sin.  Instead, it summons them to “walk in newness of life” because of their union with Christ in His death and resurrection!

In conclusion, what is the solution to the prevailing problem of easy believism?  Certainly not “hard believism”.  Not law-preaching.  Not moralism.  Not more calls to “radical discipleship.”  Not piling more burdens upon lost souls to “do more, try harder” (thereby turning the “light” and “easy” burden of Christ’s yoke – Matthew 11:28-30 – into a heavy millstone about the sinner’s neck).  Instead, the solution to this heresy is ultimately the solution to all heresies:  the gospel of Jesus Christ in its biblical clarity and fulness!

If we in the church want to counteract the problem of easy believism, let us seek to proclaim and make known the biblical good news of free and full salvation in Christ with greater clarity and emphasis.  Moralism and law-preaching (minus the gospel) kill true holiness, but the biblical gospel inspires us believers to walk in newness of life, not out of a sense of guilt and duty, but out of love and gratitude toward the Savior who died for us.